Path 3: Silicon-Based Biochemistry

Rationale: Carbon’s unique chemistry (flexible catenation, stable single/double bonds, diverse functional groups) underpins Terran life. But science fiction and science alike have long speculated about silicon-based life as an alternative. Silicon (Si) is in the same periodic group as carbon and is abundant (Earth’s crust is rich in silicates), so could life chemistry swap C for Si in organics? If silicon life is possible, it would expand our conception of biochemistry to planets where carbon is scarce but silicon is plentiful (e.g., high-temperature rocky environments, or perhaps gas-rich giants). The rationale is partly analogical – e.g., silicon can form four bonds like carbon – and partly driven by the question: Are life’s fundamental molecules (proteins, nucleic acids, etc.) unique to carbon, or just the result of carbon being available here? This path systematically examines whether silicon chemistry can meet life’s requirements for structural diversity and reactivity. Recent comprehensive reviews (Petkowski, Bains & Seager 2020) have addressed this, concluding that silicon is less promising in most environments. However, exploring the boundary conditions (e.g., could silicon form complex molecules in non-water solvents or at extreme temperatures?) is crucial to not miss potential “second-gen” biochemistries.

Prerequisites: We need a solid grasp of organosilicon chemistry – which, unlike carbon, tends to be limited by silicon’s larger atomic size and different bonding. (Prerequisite knowledge: silicon forms longer, weaker Si–Si bonds and readily bonds to oxygen, forming inert silica/silicates. It also often forms tetra-coordinate structures but struggles with double bonds and delocalized π-systems necessary for biochemical complexity.) So, understanding how to get around the lack of stable silicon analogs of, say, aromatic rings or peptide double-bond resonance is necessary. Experimental prerequisites: synthesizing and studying long polysilanes, silicones (≡ –Si–O–Si– chains), and other Si-based polymers to see if they can carry information or catalysis. High-temperature laboratory setups might be needed, because silicon compounds (like silanes) are unstable in water at Earth temperatures – many burn or polymerize to glass in presence of O₂/H₂O. We may need anaerobic glovebox systems to work with reactive Si compounds (preventing immediate oxidation). Also required is detailed thermodynamic data for silicon analogs of biomolecules: e.g., compare bond energies of Si–H, Si–O, Si–N with C–H, C=O, C–N. (Silicon’s bond to oxygen is very strong, which makes silicon prone to form SiO₂ in water – a challenge because it “freezes” silicon out as solid quartz or glass.) Therefore, a prerequisite is identifying environmental conditions that keep silicon compounds in a usable form: likely non-aqueous, low O₂ environments. The Petkowski (2020) study suggests sulfuric acid could support more silicon chemistry than water, so familiarity with such conditions is needed.

Dependencies: This path depends strongly on Path 1 and 2 findings: if water-rich environments are off-limits to silicon (due to silica formation), we turn to alternate solvents (Path 1/2) as enabling environments for silicon life. There’s also interplay with Path 4 (other element frameworks) – lessons from silicon apply to other carbon alternatives (like germanium, which is chemically similar to silicon but even heavier and rarer). Additionally, Path 3 depends on inorganic chemistry advancements: e.g., catalysts that can forge C–Si or Si–Si bonds under mild conditions (not typical in biology, but perhaps in a silicon-life analog of enzymes). It is connected to Path 5 (phosphorus use) because if a silicon life used an analogue of DNA, would it also use phosphate? Possibly not: silicon’s chemistry in water is poor, but maybe a silicon-life in, say, H₂SO₄ might use sulfates or other linking groups. Finally, there’s a dependency on planetary geology – knowing where in the universe free or organo-silicon compounds exist. (E.g., interstellar clouds have molecules like SiH₄ (silane) detected, but they polymerize quickly; some exoplanets might have silane atmospheres.) Data from meteorites or planetary atmospheres (e.g., any organosilicon detected on Titan’s surface? Current data shows Titan’s life, if any, likely wouldn’t use much silicon since Titan’s silicon is locked in crust, not in its lakes.)

Signs of Progress: A clear sign would be synthesizing a “silicon biopolymer” with properties analogous to a biomolecule. For example, a long silicone chain with side groups that can carry information (analogous to nucleotides) and showing template-directed replication or specific folding. If a research team creates a polymer where silicon replaces carbon in the backbone and it still supports base-pairing and heredity (even in a test solvent), that’s proof of concept. Another sign: discovery of an organosilicon-utilizing organism or enzyme on Earth. So far, Earth life uses silicon only passively (diatom shells of silica, sponges with silicon spicules), but no organism is known to incorporate silicon into its organic chemistry beyond a few rare compounds. However, in 2016 scientists evolved a bacterium enzyme to form C–Si bonds, creating novel organosilicon compounds (an example of biology tolerating silicon chemistry). Such achievements indicate progress. On the theoretical side, meeting the “chemistry of life” criteria with silicon in models would be a milestone: Petkowski et al. identified three criteria – diversity, reactivity, solvent compatibility – and found silicon fails in water but might work in other solvents. If future work finds a specific scenario (e.g., in 90% H₂SO₄ at 300 K) where silicon can indeed rival carbon in diversity, that would be major progress. Finally, any evidence (even indirect) of non-terrestrial life using silicon – e.g., anomalous gas ratios in a rocky planet’s atmosphere that suggest silane-based metabolisms – would be the ultimate sign, though currently none is observed.

Base Camp 3A: Silicon vs Carbon Bonding and Stability

Scope: Directly compare the fundamental chemistry of silicon and carbon relevant to life. Cover bond strengths (Si–Si vs C–C, Si–H vs C–H, etc.), structural differences (tetrahedral bonding but poor π-bonding for Si), and typical compounds (silane vs methane, silicon dioxide vs carbon dioxide). This base-camp ensures a thorough understanding of why silicon is less flexible in Earth conditions and identifies what conditions might mitigate those issues.

Stepping Stones: (i) Tabulate key bond energies and reactions: e.g., note Si–Si is ~50–60 kcal/mol weaker than C–C, and that CO₂ is a gas while SiO₂ is a refractory solid. Draw implications: in water/O₂, silicon gets oxidized to solids (like glass), removing it from circulation. (ii) Investigate Silicon analogs of biomolecules: For example, silanes vs alkanes (SiH₄ vs CH₄), silicones (–Si–O– chains) vs polyethers, and silanols vs alcohols (silanols are actually more acidic and can hydrogen bond – interestingly, some di-silanols are water-soluble). Synthesize or obtain some organosilicon compounds that parallel biomolecules (like trimethylsilanol vs tert-butanol) and compare properties (boiling point, solubility, reactivity). (iii) Examine known organosilicon biochemistry on Earth: though Earth life doesn’t incorporate Si widely, see if any enzymes interact with silicon (as noted, a cytochrome c variant was evolved to form C–Si bonds). Study that case to see what constraints had to be overcome (it required a special silicon-containing substrate and was done anaerobically to avoid oxidation). (iv) Hypothesize environmental changes: by analyzing the differences, propose conditions for each issue: e.g., avoid O₂/H₂O to prevent silica formation; supply energy for Si–Si bond formation (maybe via UV photochemistry as was done on a matrix, where UV created a double bond Si=C in lab at low T).

Base Camp 3B: Silicon in Water-Free Environments

Scope: Following the understanding that water and oxygen are “kryptonite” to silicon’s flexibility, this base-camp targets environments where silicon might thrive: e.g., anaerobic high-temperature liquids, or exotic solvents like sulfuric acid (as Petkowski suggests). The scope includes exploring silicon chemistry in reducing atmospheres (no O₂) and possibly using liquid nitrogen or other cryosolvents as media where silanes and polysilanes could exist without immediate destruction.

Stepping Stones: (i) Conduct experiments with organosilicon compounds under strictly anaerobic, dry conditions: e.g., take a simple polysilane or silicones and see if they remain stable at various temperatures when O₂/H₂O excluded (they should; for instance, silanes only spontaneously combust or hydrolyze if exposed). (ii) Test solubility and reactions of silicon compounds in alternative solvents. For instance, dissolve a organosilicon compound in sulfuric acid and see if it remains stable or transforms (Petkowski found sulfuric acid supports diverse Si chemistry – maybe silanes don’t immediately polymerize there due to lack of water). Similarly, test silanes in liquid ammonia or formamide for stability. (iii) Study mineral surface catalysis: In water-free settings, life could possibly build on silicate minerals. Investigate if clays or metal catalysts facilitate forming long -Si–Si– chains or Si–C bonds at moderate conditions. (There’s known silicate chemistry where some microbes precipitate silica; invert that: can silica surfaces catalyze organosilicon formation from simpler precursors like SiH₄ + hydrocarbons? Possibly at >200 °C without water). (iv) Explore silicon biochemistry analogs in lab: for example, attempt an enzyme substitution experiment – replace a carbon in an amino acid with silicon (making e.g. silylalanine) and see if a protein can incorporate it and still fold. Or simpler, see if some bacteria can uptake organosilicon and use it (some bacteria reportedly produce methylsilane from silicic acids with help of enzymes – recently discovered).

Base Camp 3C: Organosilicon in Biology – Bridging Attempts

Scope: Examine efforts to integrate silicon into biochemical systems, either naturally or via engineering. This base-camp acknowledges Earth life uses silicon structurally (diatoms, sponges) but not in metabolic/catalytic roles except maybe some organosilicon produced by microbes. It covers the 2016 study where a bacterial enzyme was evolved to form C–Si bonds (the first known biological formation of an organosilicon compound) – a breakthrough showing biology can incorporate silicon chemistry to a degree. Also covers any known natural organosilicon compounds (there are a few: e.g., some plants produce small organosilicon molecules, and certain microbes can methylate silicon).

Stepping Stones: (i) Literature review on known “organosilicon natural products” – list any compounds (some algae produce methylsilanes, albeit rarely). Understand how they form – often through radical SAM enzymes or other non-specific mechanisms, not a dedicated pathway. (ii) Analyze the Frances Arnold group’s directed evolution of cytochrome c to a “siliconase” – see what modifications allowed it to bind silicon’s transition state. Perhaps attempt similar directed evolution on another enzyme. (iii) Investigate if any silicon transporter proteins exist in diatoms or sponges aside from handling silicic acid (some diatoms have silicic acid transporters; could they transport a small organosilicon if present?). (iv) Synthetic biology experiment: feed an E. coli some simple organosilicon nutrient (like trimethylsilanol) and see if it can metabolize or incorporate it. Over many generations, see if mutation leads to assimilation (similar to how bacteria evolved to eat xenobiotic chemicals). This stepping stone tests life’s ability to adapt to silicon availability.

Bibliography (Path 3)

← Back to Mont Blanc – Alternative Biochemistries